PEMF Solution

WHO Expands Radiation Monitoring Framework as EM Radiation Research Trust Highlights Late Professor Grigoriev’s Warning on “Out of Control” EMF Exposure

The World Health Organization’s recent update to its radiation and health framework includes electromagnetic fields within its broader environmental radiation monitoring and health protection architecture, alongside other environmental exposures such as UV radiation and radon. This represents an acknowledgement that non-ionising radiation is now formally part of global public health surveillance and risk communication systems. However, the update does not introduce any changes to exposure limits, safety guidelines, or regulatory standards, nor does it address the rapidly expanding scale and complexity of real-world environmental exposure. Monitoring alone is not protection. Without urgent precautionary action, surveillance risks falling behind the pace of technological deployment.

Reference: World Health Organization, “Seventy-ninth World Health Assembly – Daily update (23 May 2026), EB158/9,”: https://www.who.int/news/item/23-05-2026-seventy-ninth-world-health-assembly---daily-update--23-may-2026

Related links:https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB158/B158(9)-en.pdf

It was in this broader context that Eileen O’Connor, Director of the EM Radiation Research Trust (RRT), and Co-founder of the RRT and International EMF Alliance, asked the late Professor Yuri Grigoriev a direct question comparing the relative severity of ionising and non-ionising radiation. Professor Grigoriev also served as a scientific advisor to the EM Radiation Research Trust.

Professor Grigoriev’s scientific background was extensive. He was one of the world’s most distinguished radiation scientists. He served as Chairman of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, was a member of the Russian Government Commission on the Chernobyl disaster, led radiation safety research for Soviet space medicine for 14 years, authored more than 400 scientific papers and 21 monographs, and served on numerous national and international committees on radiation protection, including work linked to WHO expert consultations.

When asked this question in 2012, he replied:

“Ionizing radiation is monitored with safety systems in place to contain and control and prevent overexposure. The current proliferation of wireless frequencies is worse as levels of non-ionizing radiation are constantly increasing and ubiquitous; it is out of control. The world-wide dissemination of mobile telecommunications has resulted in new sources of large-scale population exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields. Prevention of childhood and juvenile diseases from exposure to EMF sources is of paramount social and economic importance. It is one of the bases for public health policy in the near and long-term future. The human brain and the nervous system tissues directly perceive EMF and react irrespective of its intensity, and in certain cases it depends on EMF modulation. This feature distinguishes EMF from all other environmental factors and complicates human health risk assessment for EMF exposure.”

He further stated:
“A situation has emerged that cumulative EMF exposure of children may be comparable to adult exposure and may be equal to the levels of occupational exposure of workers. The current standards are outdated and inadequate. Urgent action is needed to curb the negative impact from this physical agent.”

And he also said:
“Man conquered the Black Plague, but he has created new problems – EMF Pollution.”

Source: Radiation Research Trust – Important information from Professor Yury Grigoriev (2012) https://radiationresearch.org/important-information-from-professor-yury-grigoriev/

It is no longer sufficient for the World Health Organization to simply monitor a problem that has already unfolded over decades of exposure. While the WHO resolution acknowledges the need for monitoring, surveillance, risk assessment and public communication regarding electromagnetic fields, it also reaffirms collaboration with ICNIRP and the continued development of guidance through that framework.

The time has come to listen to the many independent doctors, scientists and researchers who have raised concerns about the adequacy of existing exposure standards and who have called for a more precautionary approach to public health protection. ICNIRP and its guidelines have been the subject of significant scientific criticism and controversy for many years. Unless the WHO is prepared to engage more openly with the full breadth of scientific evidence and independent expert opinion, its continued reliance on ICNIRP is likely to raise further questions about the credibility of its public health guidance on electromagnetic fields. With serious scientific concerns continuing to emerge, what is needed now is emergency precautionary action, independent scientific assessment, and meaningful control of this form of radiation in the interests of public health.

Key EMF research resources include:

◆ BioInitiative Report – over 4,000 studies (bioinitiative.org)
◆ EMF‑Portal – 48,631 publications (emf-portal.org)
◆ Safer EMR – 2,500+ abstracts (saferemr.com)

This article is also available to download from our website: https://radiationresearch.org/who-expands-radiation-monitoring-framework/

fans

🔻 THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY EXPOSED A CURE FOR AGING IN 2003. THEN THEY BURIED IT. BECAUSE SICK PEOPLE ARE WORTH $4.5 TRILLION. HEALTHY PEOPLE ARE WORTH ZERO.

In 2003, a research team at Stanford University published a paper in Nature Medicine documenting the complete reversal of cellular aging in mice using pulsed electromagnetic frequencies between 7.83 Hz and 14.1 Hz. The mice didn’t just stop aging. They reversed. Organ tissue regenerated. Telomeres lengthened. Cognitive function returned to juvenile levels.

The paper was cited 12 times. Then it disappeared from every major database.

⟁

The global pharmaceutical industry generates $1.48 trillion per year. The top 10 companies alone profit $300 billion annually. Their entire business model depends on one thing: repeat customers.

A cured patient is a lost customer. A dead patient is a lost customer. But a chronically sick patient — managed, medicated, never healed — is worth $480,000 over a lifetime.

There are 133 million Americans with at least one chronic disease. That’s $63.8 trillion in lifetime pharmaceutical revenue walking around right now. Every single one of them could be restored to full health with technology that already exists.

They will never let that happen voluntarily.

⟁

In 1934, Royal Raymond Rife built a frequency machine that eliminated pathogenic organisms in 16 terminal patients. All 16 recovered. The AMA offered to buy his technology. He refused. Within 2 years, his lab was raided, his machines were destroyed, and every doctor who used his device lost their medical license.

In 1896, Tesla documented cellular regeneration through vibration. His lab burned. His work was seized.

In 2003, Stanford proved frequency reverses aging. The paper vanished.

In 2024, three classified facilities began offering full cellular restoration at $48,000 per session.

The pattern isn’t coincidence. It’s policy.

⟁

Every 11 years, a breakthrough in frequency-based healing surfaces publicly. Every time, it is suppressed within 24 months. The suppression follows the same playbook: discredit the researcher, defund the institution, classify the data, and flood the media with the word “pseudoscience” until the public forgets.

They’ve run this playbook 14 times since 1934. It has never failed.

Until now.

⟁

The difference in 2025 is decentralization. The research is no longer in one lab. The technology is no longer in one machine. The information is no longer controlled by one gatekeeper. It’s in 40,000 Telegram channels. It’s in open-source hardware schematics. It’s in the hands of engineers in 19 countries who don’t answer to the FDA, the AMA, or the pharmaceutical lobby.

They can’t burn every lab. They can’t seize every document. They can’t silence 40,000 channels.

The containment has failed. They know it. That’s why the attacks are escalating. That’s why “MedBed” is now flagged on every major platform. That’s why you’re reading this on Telegram and not on Google.

⟁

$4.5 trillion per year. That’s what’s at stake. Not your health. Your health is irrelevant to them. What matters is the revenue your sickness generates. Every pill you take is a subscription fee to a system designed to keep you at 11% so they can sell you the next pill tomorrow.

The technology to put you at 99.99% exists today. It costs nothing to deliver. It requires no medication. No surgery. No doctor visit. No insurance claim.

And that’s exactly why you’ve never heard of it.

CODE: PHARMA-4.5T / REPEAT-CUSTOMER / RIFE-DESTROYED / STANFORD-BURIED / CONTAINMENT-FAILED

$4.5 trillion per year requires 133 million sick Americans. You are the product. Your disease is the revenue. The cure was never the goal. The subscription was.

♟️
MedBedsTechnologyNews

Beware of dangerous marketing hype!!
Read the full review…
https://www.pemfmagazine.com/unveiling-the-olylife-p90-terahz-treatment-system-a-paradigm-shift-in-home-therapy/

🔻 THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION JUST CLASSIFIED ELECTROMAGNETIC FREQUENCIES AS A "CLASS 1 THERAPEUTIC AGENT" IN AN INTERNAL DOCUMENT THAT WAS NEVER RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC. THE DOCUMENT IS DATED MARCH 14, 2026.

Not "alternative." Not "complementary." Not "under investigation." Class 1 Therapeutic Agent. The same classification as surgery and pharmaceutical intervention. Equal standing. Full recognition.

The document is 67 pages. Internal reference: WHO/HIS/SDS/2026.4. It was circulated to 14 member state health ministries on March 22nd. None of them published it. None of them held a press conference. None of them updated their national health guidelines.

A health ministry official in Estonia — a country with 1.3 million people and apparently less to lose — uploaded the document to a public health transparency portal on April 9th. It was removed within 4 hours. But the Wayback Machine archived it at 11:47 AM UTC.

⟁

The document states the following:

Electromagnetic frequencies between 0.1 Hz and 1000 Hz, when applied at specific amplitudes and durations, produce measurable therapeutic outcomes in:

— Bone regeneration (7.5 Hz pulsed field, 78% acceleration vs. control)
— Chronic pain reduction (10 Hz, 64% reduction in VAS scores)
— Wound healing (15 Hz, 41% faster epithelialization)
— Depression remission (10 Hz alpha entrainment, 52% remission rate vs. 23% SSRI)
— Insomnia resolution (3 Hz delta entrainment, 71% resolution within 21 days)
— Inflammation reduction (30 Hz, CRP decrease of 38% in 14 days)

Six conditions. Six frequency ranges. All outperforming pharmaceutical interventions in controlled trials cited within the document.

⟁

The WHO has known since at least 2019. The document references 340 peer-reviewed studies. 12 meta-analyses. 7 randomized controlled trials funded by WHO member states. The evidence was never in question. The classification was delayed for 7 years.

Why?

Page 51 contains a section titled "Economic Impact Assessment." It estimates that widespread adoption of frequency-based therapeutics would displace approximately $418 billion in annual pharmaceutical revenue across the six indicated conditions.

$418 billion. That is not a typo. That is the number they calculated. That is the number that kept this document internal for 7 years.

Depression alone: $28 billion in SSRI sales per year. A 10 Hz signal from a $2000 device achieves higher remission rates. The math is not complicated. The silence is not accidental.

⟁

The classification is now official within WHO internal governance. It cannot be unwritten. It cannot be reclassified downward without a full General Assembly vote. The 14 member states that received it are now legally obligated under IHR Article 44 to "develop and implement" therapeutic frameworks based on new WHO classifications within 24 months.

24 months. March 2028. That is the deadline.

But Estonia already published it. The archive exists. The 67 pages are readable. The frequencies are listed. The protocols are described. The evidence is cited.

You don't need to wait for your government to tell you what the WHO already admitted internally. Frequencies heal. It's classified now. Not as conspiracy. As medicine.

340 studies. 67 pages. One classification that changes everything. They gave it to 14 governments and told none of them to tell you.

♟ They classified it as medicine and kept it classified. Share it before they reclassify the silence.

🚨 The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has confirmed it is undertaking a comprehensive study into the potential health impacts of cellphone radiation, including electromagnetic fields from wireless devices.

According to exclusive reporting from The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, several FDA web pages that previously stated cellphones pose no established health risks have been removed as part of this initiative.

An HHS spokesman explained: “The FDA removed webpages with old conclusions about cell phone radiation while HHS undertakes a study on electromagnetic radiation and health research to identify gaps in knowledge, including on new technologies, to ensure safety and efficacy.”

This effort, supported by $1.5 million in funding, aligns with the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission’s priorities and may include a thorough review of existing scientific literature, expert consultations, and potentially new research to address lingering questions—particularly regarding 5G and long-term exposure.

Secretary Kennedy has long advocated for greater scrutiny of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, emphasizing possible links to neurological effects, cancer risks, and developmental concerns in children.

He continues to support measures such as cellphone restrictions in schools (now implemented in 22 states under MAHA guidance) due to associations with mental health challenges, academic performance, and biological effects.

While the scientific community remains divided, several studies and classifications have prompted ongoing discussion:

• The National Toxicology Program (NTP), a major U.S. government-funded study, found clear evidence of malignant heart schwannomas in male rats exposed to high levels of RF radiation similar to that from 2G/3G phones, along with some evidence of brain gliomas and DNA damage.

• The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B) in 2011, based on limited evidence linking heavy mobile phone use to increased risks of glioma and acoustic neuroma.

• A recent WHO-commissioned systematic review of animal studies reported high certainty of associations between RF exposure and gliomas and malignant heart schwannomas, consistent with findings from the NTP and the Ramazzini Institute.

Additional research has suggested potential effects including oxidative stress, neurological and cognitive changes, reproductive impacts (such as reduced s***m quality), and blood-brain barrier alterations at certain exposure levels.

Mainstream agencies including the FDA, National Cancer Institute, and FCC maintain that there is no consistent evidence of harm to humans from typical everyday exposure levels, noting stable brain cancer rates despite widespread cellphone use.

Critics, however, point to limitations in study duration, potential industry influence, and higher absorption rates in children.

This new HHS study represents a significant step toward greater transparency and updated understanding of wireless technology’s long-term implications.

More evidence of the efficacy of PEMF 🙏🏻
https://pemfsolution.com

⚡ Electric Lymph: How Your Body’s Electromagnetic Field Influences Lymph Flow & Inflammation 🌐💧

We often think of the lymphatic system as fluid and physical — a silent river beneath our skin.
But what if your lymph doesn’t just flow with pressure… but also with energy?

Welcome to the world of bioelectric lymphatics — where your body’s electromagnetic field plays a starring role in how you heal, detox, and thrive.

🔌 Your Body Is Electric

Every cell in your body communicates through electrical charges. The nervous system, heart, brain, and even the fascia generate measurable electromagnetic fields.
• The heart produces the strongest bioelectric field, measurable feet away from the body.
• The brain creates waves that sync with circadian rhythms and gut function.
• The lymphatic vessels, particularly the initial lymphatics, are sensitive to electrostatic and piezoelectric changes — meaning movement, vibration, and energy affect their function.

💥 Why This Matters for Lymph Flow

Lymphatic capillaries have anchoring filaments that open in response to pressure changes — but they’re also influenced by:
• Piezoelectric signals from fascia and bone
• Electromagnetic fields from nerves and muscles
• Subtle energy therapies, like PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic field), bioresonance, and grounding

When your body’s electrical field is imbalanced (from EMF exposure, trauma, or chronic illness), lymph flow may slow — even if you’re doing all the right “manual” things.

🧬 Bioelectric Blockages = Fluid Stagnation

When your body’s energy is misaligned, the following can occur:
• Stiff fascia (reducing electrical conductivity)
• Inhibited vagus nerve signaling
• Shallow lymphatic uptake in areas like the head, neck, and abdomen
• Increased inflammation from unprocessed electro-chemical waste

This may explain why some patients feel instantly lighter after energy work — it’s not placebo; it’s electrically-mediated lymph drainage.

🌿 How to Support Electric Lymph Flow Naturally:
1. Grounding (Earthing) – walking barefoot resets your bioelectric field and supports inflammation reduction.
2. PEMF Therapy – stimulates cellular voltage and lymph movement at a mitochondrial level.
3. Deep Fascia Release – unwinds piezoelectric tension, especially around the spine and diaphragm.
4. Hydration with Electrolytes – water alone doesn’t conduct; minerals like sodium, potassium, and magnesium are needed for true lymph hydration.
5. Sleep in Darkness – melatonin release enhances glymphatic (brain lymph) flow, regulated by your circadian field.
6. Humming or Chanting – vibrational sound stimulates vagus nerve and fluid mobility in the neck and chest.

🌌 Final Thought:

You are not just matter — you are frequency, flow, and field.

To heal your lymph is to not only move your fluids —
but to restore your energy field so your body can resonate with healing again.

📚 References:
• Becker, R.O. (1985). The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life.
• Rubik, B. (2002). Biofield science and healing: History, terminology, and concepts.
• Pilla, A. (2013). Mechanisms and therapeutic applications of time-varying and static magnetic fields. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

©️