Craft MD
Craft MD: Phoenix’s patient-centric practice led by Double Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon Dr.Craft
Youn Stitch Reel
Gynecomastia. Same man, six months apart. Frontal, 45, lateral.
He'd done the work. Lean, training for years. The chest didn't move because it was never fat. It was gland, and gland doesn't answer to a deficit.
This is how I do it. Liposuction first, to take the fat around the gland and feather the edges. Then direct excision of the gland itself through a small incision at the lower edge of the ar**la. Then I stop early. I leave a disc of tissue under the ni**le on purpose, because taking all of it is how you get the crater: a ni**le sitting in a dent, which looks worse than what he walked in with and is much harder to fix. Then Renuvion under the skin. Helium plasma, subdermal, to tighten what lipo loosened. It's the one add-on I've kept.
It's common. Somewhere between a third and two thirds of adult men have palpable breast tissue depending on whose series you read. Most never mention it. The ones who do have usually spent years assuming it was their fault.
Photographs unretouched. Exposure and background matched between sessions. Face cropped by patient request, tattoo kept by patient consent.
10/07/2026
I'm 50. That's me, my partner, and our boys in a gym mirror, which is where I've spent most of my adult life. I was an obese kid; the weight room is where that stopped. I do almost no cardio I'd call hard.
A post told me scientists put 50-year-olds on a protocol for two years and their hearts looked 20 years younger. The post credits a podcaster and sells a book. The study is real: Howden and Levine, UT Southwestern, Circulation 2018. Sixty-one sedentary adults, mean age 53, randomized, two years.
The exercise group did four to five sessions a week, including one 4x4 interval session and strength work. VO2max went up 18 percent and the stiffness of the left ventricle dropped by about a third. The control group did yoga, balance, and strength three times a week. Nothing moved.
Read that again. The control group lifted. I lift. I have never done a 4x4. By this trial's design, I'm the control group.
Same lab tried it on 70-year-olds. Fitness improved, the heart didn't remodel. The window is middle age and it closes. I'm inside it.
So: one 4x4 a week, built up over six months, starting with one-minute intervals. Keep lifting. Get my VO2max measured now and in a year, and post both numbers, especially if they're bad. The boys are the reason.
10/05/2026
Full disclosure: I'm a Diet Coke addict. Obese kid, lost a lot of weight twice, Diet Coke was the staple both times and still is. I don't drink coffee. This is the one. So when a post said a two-year trial found diet soda works as well as water for weight loss, I wanted it to be true more than any stat I've ever checked.
Here's what the post left out. The trial was funded by the American Beverage Association. It's in the paper; the authors say the ABA had no role in the analysis, and both things can be true. 493 people started, 220 finished. Three out of four were already diet-soda drinkers when they enrolled, so it's a trial of stopping Diet Coke, not starting it. Everyone was in a weight-loss program. At two years the water group lost 3.7 kg and the diet group lost 4.8. Not significant. A tie.
What it shows: if you already drink diet soda, switching to water didn't make you lose more. What it doesn't show: that diet soda is healthy, what happened to the 55 percent who left, or what year ten looks like.
I'd have liked year ten. I'll keep drinking it anyway. I just won't quote the headline at you.
Everyone on this app is using this sound to complain about slow walkers at the airport.
I'm not complaining.
He walks slow. I walk behind him. We make our connection 100% of the time, barely.
The calf tattoo says Randy, by the way. So if anyone else is enjoying the view, know that it's spoken for.
We did not buy Lightning Lane.
In my defense, I grew up in Ohio waiting 90 minutes for the Magnum at Cedar Point with no phone and a dad who said "this builds character." I'm simply passing it on.
I didn't set foot in Disneyland until I was an adult. The boys are six. They're already ahead of me and they still think we're trash.
Why I run the Aerolase before microneedling, not after, and why ReyaGel goes on last.
Step 1: Aerolase Neo Elite. Four passes at the setting Aerolase publishes for facial rejuvenation. The 650-microsecond 1064 nm pulse heats the dermis without touching the surface: it coagulates the tiny vessels feeding oil glands and inflamed spots, calms background redness, and gives the dermis a thermal collagen signal (heat-shock proteins, including the one that chaperones collagen). The laser needs clean, dry, product-free skin, so it goes first. You never pass a laser over open channels or heat a topical into them.
Step 2: Microneedling. Mechanical collagen induction, and thousands of channels that stay open for minutes. This is the main engine. The laser makes the field better; the needles build the collagen.
Step 3: ReyaGel. A solubilized extracellular matrix: collagen, elastin, hyaluronic acid, peptides, growth factors, and extracellular vesicles. FDA-cleared topical. Into the channels immediately, while they're open.
Two collagen signals plus the raw materials, one appointment. The Neo adds no epidermal injury, so recovery is the microneedling recovery, and in my patients the redness settles faster with the gel than without it.
What I owe you: the laser parameters come from published rosacea and acne-scar protocols (6 mm spot, four crosshatch passes, endpoint transient redness). The collagen data on the Neo alone is modest; the big numbers you see in ads come from studies that combined it with an erbium laser. The combination evidence for laser plus microneedling is for a different Nd:YAG and a different target. ReyaGel's evidence is case series. Nobody has run this exact three-step stack against needling alone. The theory is sound. The trial doesn't exist yet. When it does, you'll hear it from me either way.
I buy all three. No relationship with Aerolase or ReyaGel.
General education, not individual medical advice. Whether this protocol fits your skin is a conversation with your own provider.
Dr. Andersen did not have surgery. That red line is a marker. He volunteered his abdomen so I could show you how I close incisions now, without a running suture on top.
Step 1: BRIJ-SEAL. A sterile film that seals the incision. No glue, no cyanoacrylate, so none of the glue rashes. Waterproof and breathable. The company's third-party lab testing says it holds as a bacterial barrier for 14 days. You shower in it.
Step 2: Brijjit force-modulating tissue bridges on top. Each one pulls the skin edges toward each other and offloads tension from the incision. Tension is the thing that widens and thickens scars.
What the data actually says:
In finite-element modeling, a suture concentrates about 4,000 mmHg at the skin; a bridge about 20. That is a computer model, published by the device's inventor.
In a randomized trial at UT Southwestern, 34 women having breast reduction got bridges on one breast and standard sutures on the other. T-junction breakdown: 3% with bridges vs 32% with sutures. Scar area 38% smaller at 8 weeks. Small trial, early results, 12-month scar scores still pending.
A 243-patient cohort in breast surgery: significant wounds 1.7% vs 15.2%. Retrospective in part, single surgeon, company leadership on the author list.
So: promising, consistent direction, small numbers, and the people who invented it wrote most of the papers. I read all of that and I still use it, because the downside is low and the tension logic is sound. Bridges get swapped every two weeks for up to eight. Nothing to take out at your first visit.
I buy this. No relationship with the company.
General education, not individual medical advice. Whether this is right for your incision is a conversation with your own surgeon.
09/30/2026
A viral post says the number one predictor of a successful man is a father who loved his mother. There is no mother in this house. So I went looking for the study.
There isn't one.
The "Harvard professor" is Arthur Brooks, a columnist, writing an essay that kids copy what parents do rather than what they say. True, and it applies to both parents. His father-specific evidence is one paper on churchgoing. The "boys de-identify from their mothers" study, I could not find. What I found instead: 265 mother-son pairs followed from age 5 to 15, where conflict with mom predicted delinquency and warmth with mom predicted better friendships. And the "father who loved his mother" line is a quotation, John Wooden or Theodore Hesburgh depending on who's posting it. A good line is not a finding.
What actually held up:
Fathers matter. A 47-study meta-analysis compared mothers' and fathers' parenting against kids' anxiety and depression and found nearly identical associations. One difference out of dozens tested.
How the adults treat each other matters. 93 studies, 41,207 kids: when parents cooperate and don't fight through the child, the child does better. Modest effect, same for boys and girls.
Boys are more sensitive to a chaotic home than their sisters. Every child born in Florida from 1992 to 2002, brothers compared with sisters: family disadvantage hurt boys more. That is the true thing buried inside the "boys need dads" genre. It's a stability-shaped hole, not a mother-shaped one.
He watches how I treat Matt. How I treat his teacher, the waiter, myself. The copying part is real. The "it has to be a woman" part is not in any study I could find.
Love the people in his house. Keep the volume down. Show up.
General education, not individual medical advice. Sources pinned below.
09/28/2026
A post going around says a high-carb diet made people four years younger in a month. It came with a photo of pasta. My six-year-old saw it and considered the matter settled.
I read the study. It's real, and it's better than the headline: 104 people aged 65 to 75, randomized to four diets for four weeks, all food supplied. The omnivore high-carb group's "biological age" dropped 3.5 to 4.1 years, and the high-fat, high-animal-protein group's didn't move. Two things the headline leaves out. First, "biological age" here is a score built from labs, cholesterol, glucose, insulin, blood pressure, so nobody got younger; their bloodwork looked like a younger person's after a month of real food, and the study's own author says "younger" overstates it. Second, "high-carb" meant potatoes, grains, and beans, whole and minimally processed. The authors say it shouldn't be extended to refined sugar. The Blizzard was not in the trial.
Last month I fact-checked a study saying low-carb blunts muscle. This month, whole-food carbs improve aging markers. Two studies, one direction. At 50, I'm listening.
General education, not individual medical or nutrition advice. Talk to your own physician before changing your diet.
Sources:
Andrews CJ et al. Aging Cell, 2026 (University of Sydney; 104 adults, 4-week RCT, Klemera-Doubal biological age)
Paoli A et al. Nutrients, 2021 (the carbs-and-muscle study from last month)
Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.
Category
Contact the business
Telephone
Website
Address
4630 E Indian School Road
Phoenix, AZ
85018
Opening Hours
| Monday | 8am - 4pm |
| Tuesday | 8am - 4pm |
| Wednesday | 8am - 4pm |
| Thursday | 8am - 4pm |
| Friday | 8am - 4pm |
Alerts
Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Craft MD posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
